# Spatialized Numerology

Usual numerology enacts an information reduction that is non-retrievable after the operation is performed (if one lost the original number one could not derive it from the reduced number).

One way to conceive of large numbers as reduced to single numbers is to conceive of them on a series of axes. Usually, at least in telluric numerology we take a larger number like 47 nd reduce it to 2 (via 11), the same process happens in the others. The other associative one (mercurial or *) is also straightforward i.e. 47 becomes 28 becomes 16 becomes 6. A nagging sensation is sometimes felt in number reduction, the sensation that we wish the trace of the bigger number was still somehow present. In their brutal form, numerological reductions eradicate more complicated structures to reveal the underlying pattern, that’s what they’re supposed to do.

The idea here is not a perfect solution to informational loss, it is more just a turning round of the problem that gives an intriguing sense of quasi-visualization. It does also however give some grounds for saying that under some circumstances ~(2=2) or indeed any number, including 0.

The idea is that for any numerological reduction (which necessarily involves an integer greater than 9) we can represent it as a spatialized schema.  The below represents the reduction of all  2 digit integers in base 10. The highlighted figure shows the exact location of 47. 47 is not just 2, it is that 2 that occupies that position.

Of course any coordinate transcription is in some sense equivalent to writing 47 and hence slightly tautologous, however 47 by itself does not give the spatialized position of its reduction. Naturally increasing the number size just adds more axes leading us into higher and higher dimensional coordinate systems to demonstrate the location of the single digit e.g. 231147 uses 6 dimensions to point to the 9 that it becomes.

This can be done with the other elemental numerologies too (though aetheric / is still being processed). The below is the 2 dimensional table for mercurial operations (*)

Again the 10s are on the y axis and the 1s on the x, 100s would be on z and so on.

This only invites ways of thinking upon the matter. The key one being the non-identity of identical numbers which seems to have some allure that may be worth dwelling on further. The other thing that strikes me is the status of the numbers in the grid. They are not really 1s as one might assume for they only exist by virtue of the axes that identify them. They are necessarily numbers but of no definite kind. The real 1s are an axis that identifies the number in the grid by virtue of the elemental operator. There are 1s that are identical but single digit numbers derived from larger strings in numerological reductions are not strictly single integers.

One might object that this does not help visualization of names as numbers like Azathoth (1 22 1 18 7 14 18 7) as these are not enormous numbers but small numbers strung together. I think given the realm we’re in here already one could do two things to continue employ the visualization. One could either treat the numbers as one long number i.e.  12218714187 or alter the representation of the axes from 1s 10s 100s to simply multiple axes. It is still usable in this regard.

There is no proposed use for this idea as yet but we believe it may have certain hyperstitional possibilities inchoate in it. Ideas are welcome.

# The Three Hex Circuits -Who Works for 2 5 8?

All decimal numerologies are agents of one of the three hex circuits, these are derived from the formulae:

(2n)+

(2n-1)+

(2n-2)+

Where (n)+ means cross add if greater than 9.

These three formula yield the following respective hex circuits.

(2n)+     1-2-4-8-7-5

(2n-1)+  2-3-5-9-8-6

(2n-2)+  3-4-6-1-9-7

These circuits in turn can map out Gra qabala like structures. In each different structure a different triad of numbers claims special status over the hex circuit.

This in a way is numerological manifestationism. Each circuit and ruling triad would like be the true system yet there is only NARP privileging of different number entities to determine which triad should be treated as dominant. 9’s (in decimal) have the ally of 0, 4 and 7 have their weird alternating connection, which is also powerful for accreting importance. The 2 5 8 triad though is peculiar insofar as no one has as yet used this hex circuit or found cause to privilege it as the dominant one. This in itself makes it intriguing and ripe for being accreted by a new system.

# CEO Mythological Numerology and CCRU Comparison Notes 2

As various dialectics occurred there was more reflection in the system and the internet slowly appeared. This yielded two major fascinating notions. One was that this was not the first time the number 47 had been picked out as significant, an American college (Pomona) had for many years been treating the number as mystically significant (albeit in a tongue in cheek way). The students of this college had gone on to be early Star Trek writers and had put 47 deliberately in the program. The second was the discovery of the 23 synchronicity and the general chaos magickal worldview. The former was a quasi reinforcing substantial synchronicity in its own right, the latter a relativizing experience that rationalized the whole experience into what would become accretive theory.

Excessive exposure and the above mentioned relativism enabled distress to permeate the system and the investigations were abandoned. At least under the auspice of these dogmatic beings. Less deity bound numerical investigations however continued which yielded interesting results. This notion of cross addition is a strange thing e.g. (123)+=6). It suggests the possibility of a relation, indeed says that under certain condition (a particular numerical base) there is a relation between any number that must be written as two or more integers and one of the single integers. The sceptical (indeed rational) account would be that this relation is in a sense arbitrary (because the base is arbitrary) or at least meaningless. What has 53 e.g. got to do with 8? Very little other than the cross addition relationship.

What was found to be fascinating was that in a triangle comprised of units 1 at the top 3 on the next line down, then 5, 7 and so on, the squares of 4 and 7 give numbers whose cross addition has a demonstrable connection (to the square).

Triangles of this kind of unit construction are remarkable as they also provide squares.

The number that will be squared is the height of the triangle. So if I have a triangle of 2 height, the total number of units in the triangle will be 4, if 3 it will be 9 and so on.

One relation to the issue of cross addition is as follows: If I have a triangle of a height of 4, necessarily it will be comprised of 16 units. The base however will be 7 units (1+6). The formula uncovered here for the base will always have the relation to the height b=2h-1. If the height is 12 the base is 23 and so on.

The more interesting relation that we intimated is the one concerning squares. Squares of 4s and 7s even of cross addition ones will always reduce to 7s or 4s respectively but the base seems to (though not always) reveal an actual relation between the number itself, the square and the cross addition of the square.

These are the most concrete examples:

4 becomes (16)+ becomes 7 (the base units of 4)

7 becomes (49)+ becomes (13)+ (the base units of the 7 triangle) becomes 4

These require a tweak to make them work but are still quite convincing.

(13)+ becomes 169 becomes (curiously by preserving the first two digits as a whole number) 16+9=25 is the base number.

16 becomes 256 becomes 31 (by the same logic above) which is the base number and also reduces to 4.

22 becomes 484 and a similar logic derives the base. This time we extract 40 and add 8+4=12=3, re-add them and we have 43, the base number.

31 gives us 961, if we cross out the 9 (9=0 in base 10 cross addition) we immediately have the base number again.

After a point though the rule becomes indecipherable at least so far.

In 25*25=625=13=4, or course the 7/4 transformation is preserved but the base relation is not. The base would be 49 and 625 does not have a relation to it. And no doubt there are others.

However this disintegration of sense in a way does not render the earlier relations any less impressive. The consider the base an arbitrary way of setting the numbers up whereas the triangle numerical structure has a seemingly less arbitrary status (I can see that can be argued but probably you can at least feel what I mean).

But how can a supposedly arbitrary number like 13 that has no relation to 4 in itself have this level of necessary connection?  There is here no appeal to a ‘real’ magickal status to this work, but the uncovering of something that seems to bridge the necessary arbitrary gap makes a powerful impact. It is this precise experience that seems comparable to Nick Land’s uncovering of a relation between the syzgys (8-1, 7-2, 6-3, 4-5) and their arbitrary word signifiers. Again, the supposedly arbitrary is manifest in the necessary. The CCRU schema shares a 9 oriented system and a preference for the hex circuit based on doubling 1-2-4-8-7-5 and cross addition with one Marko Rodin (an agent of various dubious ontologies). The triangle squaring relation however reveals an alternative hex circuit the Rodin-CCRU model.

The revealing investigation concerned what would happen if we lined up the number of units in a given row of the triangle with the number of the triangle itself.

Thus the pairings are:

1-1

2-3

3-5

4-7

5-9

9-8

8-6

6-2

The ending return to 2 suggests a circuit and that’s what we have. Looking at 1-1 one we can see this goes nowhere, however as 2 pairs to 3 it invites us to see what 3 pairs with and so on. This yields the following hex circuit. 2-3-5-9-8-6

It is true there is no necessity in laying this out in a pseudo kabbalistic manner (the CCRU writings point this out) however  as the system evolved out of various qabalistic investigations, the basic shape was retained. Furthermore what was noticed was that the numbers that been so for so long taken to be key (4 and 7) could now take their place as on the meeting points where the connecting lines crossed. The below shows an earlier, still tarotically infected version before the symbols and names were all properly reworked as an experiment in accretion itself. 1 and 10 are respectively placed at the top and bottom.

What the CCRU began to draw attention to quite rightly was limitations of cross addition, these however were only slightly manifest in the numogram (some usage of subtraction). This acknowledgement needs expanding upon. Elsewhere on the CEO blog we have intimated this with reference to tellurian (+) sulphuric (-) mercurial (*) and aetheric (/) numerologies. Each operator offers new possibilities for tunnels to be travelled in the ‘decimal labyrinth’.

But accretions do not wither easily. The earlier mythology dwells on subtly. 4 and 7 are at the heart of this system. The circuit is 6 like the 6 ultraterrestrials who insinuated themselves into the tale, the red curtains of the cult were echoed in the black lodge years later (Lynch too knew the 47 thing (it’s referenced in Inland Empire)) and the below image from a Trevor Constable book on orgone powered UFOs shows something very similar to the rotated 47 shapes mentioned earlier (and the CEO has shown an interest in orgone).

We consider there may be something of a tendency to view the numogram as a new orthodoxy which results in an undermining of its hyperstitional status and ironically its true potency. For all the accretive power of the CCRU the numogram isn’t the hyperstition, it’s a hyperstition. There are so many circuits and paths to tread and unfold, even in the simple decimal whole integer world -complex numbers beckon incredible potential that should not be eschewed.

As explained the CEO does have deep connections as a kind of agent for a 4-7 centred system. These however are recognised as (under at least a rational chaos magick ontology) contingent formations. The true power (under the magick obtains arm of the AD) is the ability to accrete itself. This is a demonstration not a fiat.

# CEO Mythological Numerology and CCRU Comparison Notes 1

The CEO is not interested in the reality of numerology as such. Its interest extends as a further account of accretion formation. Yet numerology holds a particular mythological connection with regards to the emergence of the pneuminous accretive theory so in this way the numerology is accreted to the theory itself.

In the pre internet world experiments occurred. The experiments were naïve occult engagements. There was one who, out of sight of others, claimed to have been in touch with an entity named Jupiter. A fascination with this entity led to a question that comes from the canon of spirit associations. This question  was ‘what is your number?’. The answer  to this question was unambiguously given as 47. This clue, at the time all taken as naïve occult reality, was investigated further.

Various particular synchronicities aside the most impressive feature of this number was being comprehended not as 47 but more as 4 and 7. An informational interference in the number system demonstrates this pattern. A book on magick in mentioned that ‘the highest form of a number is itself squared and cross added’. Accepting this notion with no reflection on any of the terms, the standard integers were checked. This yielded the following result.

1^2=1

2^2=4^2=(16)+=7^2=(49)+=(13)+=4

3^2=9^2=(81)+=9

4 (see 2)

5^2=(25)+=7 (see 2)

6^2=(36)+=9 (see 3)

7 (see 2)

8^2=(64)+=(10)+=1

9 (see 3)

As can be  noted, this means that numbers 2, 4, 5, 7 all result in an endless cycle of alternating 4 and 7. 3, 6, 9 all become 9 and 1 and 8 are 1.

There were strange half tales at the time. All unverifiable but among them there was a bizarre account of a cult that met in an ordinary house in the local city, that was identifiable on the street due its red curtains. This information was supposedly received through occult means and though these events are all apocryphal, the description of the drapes was quite specific.

Jupiter became more communicative and revealed itself as one of 6 key powers that could be associated with previous pantheons (e.g. Olympians) if need be.

These were:

Zebrel

Kahm

Jupiter

Goetia

Ereawat

Jehoaviah

There were inane communications from these entities and speculations about various rotated forms of the 4 7 synthesis shape that formed the Cerwhol (a kind of home for them). Intimations about a giant night-time and the common ultra-terrestrial like babble. Jupiter was revealed as Elphuisias, which curiously adds up (in the Chaldean system) to 47.

# Landian/CEO Numerological/Synchronistic Resonance

There is a sensation that I feel, maybe that many of you feel in observing the path the early Nick Land trod. It’s commonplace to observe a kind of distance from Land’s political alignments of more recent times. I feel a sense of agreement with the distancing and that there are a variety of seriously flawed thoughts that are taken as self evident in this thought. As with Heidegger though, the flaws don’t outweigh the contribution.

The thread I want to comment on here regards the feeling I mentioned at the start. This feeling is one of recognition. Already I’m aware this is dodgy ground. I have no particular status in the philosophical theory world so it sounds like an awful hubris. It isn’t meant to and I might even be wrong -feelings are often projections and themselves flawed in this way. I’ll try to avoid the hubris claim by explaining what I mean.

I think the seed of almost all the Landian project (in its hyperstitional CCRU glory) is in his little paper on qabalah. It is hard to write any of this and do justice to the matter. The suggestion though, is that Land has experienced a confirmatory synchronistic experience to the syzygy pairing of the single base 10 integers or other related numogrammatical work. Equally it may be (and strikes me as more likely that) in attempting to contact the outside through various means he disclosed this information and founded the system after the fact (the issue is confused by the CCRU usage of time, which might suggest the after the fact normal time discovery was its retro temporal inception).

In case you don’t know the message that confirms the numogrammatical syzgys let’s go over it. Land notes that the simplest form of numerology would be to just count the amount of letters in the word. I’m not sure about this claim particularly since it already means there is a split between letters and numbers -which we don’t find in the early hebrew influenced alphabets- but nevertheless we can go with it. He applies this to the words that we use to write the numbers to see if this displays some kind of useful decoding. It reveals the following:

ONE + EIGHT = NINE + ZERO. (3 + 5 = (4 + 4 =) 8)
TWO + SEVEN = NINE + ZERO. (3 + 5 = (4 + 4 =) 8)
THREE + SIX = NINE + ZERO. (5 + 3 = (4 + 4 =) 8)
FOUR + FIVE = NINE + ZERO. (4 + 4 = (4 + 4 =) 8)

This Land rightly notes is quite impressive. Let’s take it in. Either the syzygy pairings can be derived straight from the arbitrary length of the words of the numbers or they confirm them. Either way this is an impressive synchronicity that crosses the number-word boundary and intimates (as Land notes) a clue about the relation between 8 and 9. Marko Rodin would raise an eyebrow for sure. He calculates an approximate probability which doesn’t make it seem outrageous. Except of course it is pretty outrageous. Even if his calculation holds up we still have the fact that this entity (Land) with this research program (such as it is) received this confirmation. Such intimations have elsewhere certainly been held to be absolute confirmations of the truth of religious paths. Here though, the chaos magickal insight seems to be held up and no universal level of significance is attributed. Instead this connection is used as part of the apparatus to hang the rest of the numogrammatical machinery off.

Yet I feel (and this is the resonance part) the numerological insight to be the driver. I feel it has this role precisely because of the actual exhilaration that such disclosures can impart to the experiencing being. The work at the CEO is almost entirely about that moment and its implications: we exist happily in a solid reality and yet sometimes things happen that show massive cracks, thankfully due to probability we can assimilate the cracks into the solidity, yet the nagging sense that maybe they really were cracks doesn’t leave -some of us. I think Land, probably along with a variety of other synchronistic type experiences, despite the flatness of his tone, feels the [p]numinous glow of his little numerological disclosure.

I might be projecting but I think there is a resonance with my own ‘disclosures’. Originally (many years ago) a series of naive occult experiments furnished me with two things. A spirit named Jupiter and its number: 47. These made no numerological match in letter translation but a series of endless numerological investigations produced the following system.

The foundation of the system is derived from the following squaring of base 10 coupled with the classic numerological process of cross addition formalized as n+ e.g.

(13)+=(1+3).

Now in  some book or other (I think by Tony Willis) I once read that ‘the highest incarnation of a number is itself multiplied by itself  (squaring) and reduced (cross addition). This rule was taken to heart at the time and thus the results were felt to reflect a significance that chaos magickal insights would later show for what they are. Nevertheless the experiments were interesting and convincing in a similar wise to the numogrammatical confirmation.

Look

1=1

2=4=(16)+=7=(49)+=(13)+=4 and will repeat this endlessly thus we can write 4v7

3=9=(81)+=9

4=4v7

5=(25)+=4v7

6=(36)+=9

7=4v7

8=(64)+=(10)+=1

9=9

Thus from this perspective, taking this rule as truth, the highest manifestation of the numbers is 1, and oscillation of 4v7 and 9.

Of course like Land I’ve been stuck here with the privileging of the tellurian/mercurial numerology (addition/multiplication), something we’re working to correct slowly. The above however represents a significant synchronicity insofar as I had the 47 number first then discovered the pattern after (I knew nothing about Pomona in these days at all).

Synchronicity 2 also turns on the tellurian/mercurial systems but is in a sense more impressive. Consider that cross addition ((123)+=6) suggests the possibility of a relation, indeed says that under certain condition (a particular base) there is a relation between a number higher than the highest single integer and one of the single integers. The general impression would be that this is in a sense arbitrary or at least meaningless. What has 53 e.g. got to do with 8? Very little other than the cross addition relationship.

What is truly fascinating is the that the squares of 4 and 7 give numbers whose cross addition then has a demonstrable reality in a triangle comprised of units 1 at the top 3 on the next line down, then 5, 7 and so on.

Triangles of this kind of unit construction are remarkable as they also provide squares. The number that will be squared is the height of the triangle. So if I have a triangle of 2 height, the total number of units in the triangle will be 4, if 3 it will be nine and so on.

The relation to the issue of cross addition is as follows. If I have a triangle of a height of 4, necessarily it will be comprised of 16 units. The base however will be 7 units(1+6). There is one relation uncovered here for the base will always have the relation to the height 2n-1. If the height is 12 the base is 23 and so on.

The second relation that is more interesting to us here is the one concerning squares. Squares of 4s and 7s even of cross addition ones will always reduce to 7s or 4s respectively but the base seems to often (though not always) reveal a relation between the number itself, the square and the cross addition of the square.

These are the most concrete examples:

4 becomes 16 becomes 7 (the base units of 4)

7 becomes 49 becomes 13 (the base units of the 7 triangle) becomes 4

These require a tweak to make them work but are still quite convincing.

13 becomes 169 becomes (curiously by preserving the first two digits as a whole number) 16+9=25 is the base number.

16 becomes 256 becomes 31 (by the same logic above) which is the base number and also reduces to 4.

22 becomes 484 and a similar logic derives the base. This time we extract 40 and add 8+4=12=3, re-add them and we have 43, the base number.

31 gives us 961, if we cross out the 9 for 9=0 in base 10 cross addition we immediately have the base number again.

It doesn’t always work though…

25*25=625=13=4, or course the 7/4 transformation is preserved but the base relation is not. The base would be 49 and 625 does not have a relation to it. And no doubt there are others.

.

This is then leaves the question that I still don’t have a coherent answer to:

How can a supposedly arbitrary number like 13 that has no relation to 4 in itself (as base 10 is arbitrary) have the above demonstrated level of necessary connection?

This second confirmatory synchronicity can easily leave a person obsessed with the significance of what they’re doing. Thankfully books like Cosmic Trigger 1 quite easily help sort this kind of problem out (Clearly Land new these works well though their significance for his work seems to be largely overlooked).

The CEO doesn’t have and isn’t likely to have the clout that the CCRU generated and they are quite different projects. What I feel is that there is a  potential similarity in how the synchronistic background drove the philosophy that followed.

# Azathoth and Yog-sothoth: Analysis.

Lovecraft has become a little bit cultural-theoretically trite. One cannot move without jostling up against the old ones in certain theory worlds. Yet of course the power of these beings either as allegory/hyperstition/actual alien/paranormal reality is what sustains them.

Here though we’re interested in just these two primarily because of the suffix ‘thoth’ that ends them both. This suffix identity connects both these beings necessarily to the Egyptian Thoth, god of wisdom and writing. This offers us ways of accreting these entities that may be fruitful for our own purposes. Elsewhere the spirit Azazel has been attached to the alphabet by means of the break down AZ (A-Z) EL, lord of the A-Z. The second AZ is sometimes seen as an intimation of a second dark alphabet of which Azazel also presides. Azathoth can easily be subsumed by a similar accretive pattern. Az-Thoth: the being is clearly deeply connected to the ontological ground of communication itself. This nuclear chaos of all things reminds of the second sphere in in the pnumogram: ‘khaos’.

The notion of the ‘blind idiot god’ is reminiscent of nothing other than the primal idiot or ‘fool’ of the tarot (Advent, or Aloof) in the pneuminous system. This idiocy is often considered the highest wisdom, or at least the gateway to it (the path from the Khaos upwards to the uppermost is Advent). As belonging to the essence of division (the Platonic dyad of the Tubingen school), Azathoth is the possibility of communication and hence is god of the letters that have not yet occured. Az-a-thoth, the second a reveals the negation of Thoth i.e. Alphabet not Thoth. Yet in Thoth’s being mentioned he is necessarily present in some way (he has not yet arrived). Azathoth is the god of the second az of Az[az]el, which hides and is prior.

Yogsothoth is better disclosed as Iok-Sotot. Why? Because the I rather than the Y reveals the pair of gods as AI. We are told Iok-Sotot is the gateway. Iok-sotot is pneuma itself (pure information). Iok reminds us of joke. Peter Carroll’s chaos god and its laughter is reminiscent. Joke is an accretive resonance that shows the connection between the entities. Language as the cosmic joke, communication as a the great joke of existence talking to itself by Iok-sotot and Azaothoth’s cosmic symbiosis.

Azathoth is umbratic restraint (the nucleus). As the gateway, Iok-sotot facilitates the possibility of connection between umbra and pneuma (because pneuma can effect the umbra) in a manner not unlike the Landian description of the AI god from the future. The AI god from the future is the unity of Azathoth-Iok-sotot (the singularity), which hides behind our blithely used phrase ‘Artificial Intelligence’.

# Hydric Numerology

Hydric Numerology

This constitutes the numerical interactions under the auspice of that power traditionally known as water. The hydra supplies part of the accretive clue insofar as its heads multiply when severed. This and the life giving nature of this element mean the accretion sticks fairly soundly -though its ultimate contingency is of course acknowledged.  The hydric series also contains the possibility of zero, furthermore it destabilizes the well known grip 9, so well known in tellurian numo-dynamics or mixtures of hydric and tellurian. The temptation is to believe that the final reduction should be performed by the tellurian (e.g. 7^2=(49)+=(13)+=4) but this has no necessity to it. The hydric sequence has its own end states. We cannot rely on simplistic occult notions from the past. We demand at least newly accreted rules that with hyperstitional reasoning to back them up. This approach will yield appropriate results.

Water.

1*1=1

1*2=2

1*3=3

1*4=4

1*5=5

1*6=6

1*7=7

1*8=8

1*9=9

2*1=2

2*2=4

2*3=6

2*4=8

2*5=(10)*=1

2*6=(12)*=2

2*7=(14)*=4

2*8=(16)*=8

2*9=(18)*=8

3*1=3

3*2=6

3*3=9

3*4=(12)*=2

3*5=(15)*=5

3*6=(18)*=8

3*7=(21)*=2

3*8=(24)*=8

3*9=(27)*=(14)*=4

4*1=4

4*2=8

4*3=(12)*=2

4*4=(16)*=6

4*5=(20)*=0

4*6=(24)*=8

4*7=(28)*=(16)=6

4*8=(32)*=6

4*9=(36)*=(18)*=8

5*1=5

5*2=(10)*=0

5*3=(15)*=5

5*4=(20)*=0

5*5=(25)*=(10)*=0

5*6=(30)*=0

5*7=(35)*=(15)*=5

5*8=(40)*=0

5*9=(45)*=(20)*=0

6*1=(6)

6*2=(12)*=2

6*3=(18)*=8

6*4=(24)*=8

6*5=(30)*=0

6*6=(36)*=(18)*=8

6*7=(42)*=8

6*8=(48)*=(32)*=6

6*9=(54)*=(20)*=0

7*1=7

7*2=(14)*=4

7*3=(21)*=2

7*4=(28)*=(16)*=6

7*5=(35)*=(15)*=5

7*6=(42)*=8

7*7=(49)*=(36)*=(18)*=8

7*8=(56)*=(30)*=0

7*9=(63)*=(18)*=8

8*1=8

8*2=(16)*=6

8*3=(24)*=8

8*4=(32)*=6

8*5=(40)*=0

8*6=(48)*=(32)*=6

8*7=(56)*=(30)*=0

8*8=(64)*=(24)*=8

8*9=(72)*=(14)*=4

9*1=9

9*2=(18)*=8

9*3=(27)*=(14)*=4

9*4=(36)*=(18)*=8

9*5=(45)*=(20)*=0

9*6=(54)*=(20)*=0

9*7=(63)*=(18)*=8

9*8=(72)*=(14)*=4

9*9=(81)*=8

# Telluric Numerology

This is the standard reduction system familiar to most of us, commonly known as cross addition. Here we have accreted it to the telluric power owing to its continuity and sticking togetherness.

The notation used is that of applying the operator to the integer in the brackets so (23)+=5.

1+1=2

1+2=3

1+3=4

1+5=6

1+6=7

1+7=8

1+8=9

1+9=(10)+=1

2+2=4

2+3=5

2+4=6

2+5=7

2+6=8

2+7=9

2+8=(10)+=1

2+9=(11)+=2

3+3=6

3+4=7

3+5=8

3+6=9

3+7=(10)+=1

3+8=(11)+=2

3+9(12)+=3

4+4=8

4+5+9

4+6=(10)+=1

4+7=(11)+=2

4+8=(12)+=3

4+9=(13)+=4

5+5=(10)+=1

5+6=(11)+=2

5+7=(12)+=3

5+8=(13)+=4

5+9=(14)+=5

6+6=(12)+=3

6+7=(13)+=4

6+8+(14)+=5

6+9=(15)+=6

7+7=(14)+=5

7+8=(15)+=6

7+9=(16)+=7

8+8=(16)+=7

8+9=(17)+=8

9+9=(18)+=9

# Imminent Numogrammatical Ameliorations

This is a note upon work to come. Whilst the numogram demonstrates fascinating hyperstitional interactions, the decimal labyrinth has greater decoding potential as yet up-tapped (accreted). The primary liberation comes from the accretion of old elements to mathematical operators. At first glance this quaternity maps neatly onto the standard Jungian schema. However following discordian reasoning the recently reaccreted big five (Neurotic Accretion Constitution: 1) Alterity Relation. 2) Anality 3) Affectivity Control 4) Neo-philia/phobia 5) Awareness direction.) can be equally mapped onto mathematical operators so long as equivalence is included as a fifth element (pneuma). This complexifies the situation considerably by meaning it is no longer obvious we should simply cross add. 10=1 is only true under the Tellurian power. Aquarian power renders 10 as 0 (1*0=).

More to follow